Ron Paul : Stop Dreaming

Back




Congressman Paul's consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, "Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers' ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are." Another colleague observed, "There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few."



Channel: News Politics
Uploaded: May 14, 2007 at 9:36 am
Author: aravoth

Length: 00:08:46
Rating: 4.75
Views: 1777947

Tags: Ron Paul Next President Debate Republican Democrat NAU NWO Liberty Freedom Alex Jones federal reserve

Video Comments:
dviesq (January 10, 2009 at 2:40 am)
He ain't giving up his membership card for principle. He's not stupid.
dviesq (January 10, 2009 at 2:15 am)
You tell me he's different. Yet, he's a club member. It works for him, politically.
dviesq (January 10, 2009 at 2:14 am)
When it comes to it, you trade in your free thinking and objectivity for party loyalty. You still don't see that the two parties play for the same team. What's he accomplishing as a representative? Out of DIGNITY and INTEGRITY, given the past 8 years, he should've quit the party and ran 3rd party. Whatever.
Manchin2be (January 9, 2009 at 4:49 pm)
Wonder why no trolls are here:-D. Try focus on what whent well, and improve till next election in my opinion.
axlerodhomeboy (January 9, 2009 at 5:36 am)
He ran 3rd party... from within the Republican party, AND he got to hold onto his seat in Congress. I know my dumb ass Congressman doesn't even seem to HAVE principles. He believes very strongly in our nations drug laws. He voted for Iraq every time it came up, and he's a blue-dog frickin' democrat that wants to listen to peoples' phone conversations. Pervert.
axlerodhomeboy (January 9, 2009 at 5:25 am)
You should be ECSTATIC with his decisions. He made republicans (especially McCain) look stupid, petty, and irrelevant. Those tools still talk about the party of Reagan... the party of Lincoln... plz. What about the party of axlerodhomeboy, you tools? So they claim to be "conservative." Conservative of WHAT? Where do they draw the line? At what point in history do they determine things were good enough to start preserving them? They, like democrats, pick and choose whatever is popular
axlerodhomeboy (January 9, 2009 at 5:08 am)
Furthermore, who would own his seat in Congress? I'll tell you who. A man that praised Paul publicly until it was politically inconvenient for him to do so, then he turned on him. A democrat. Just another POLITICIAN, but one less principled, less influential, and probably less interested in the things that made Paul appealing in the first place. We'll have to agree to disagree on this. You won't budge, and neither will I.
axlerodhomeboy (January 9, 2009 at 4:53 am)
You are pardoned. Even if you're right, he just ends up playing Nader to McCain, and the repubs blame him for the dem victory, and what remaining influence does he have? A Nader-like influence? Plz. It was a CHOICE, man... a choice he had to make. So you disagree with the decisions he made. What do you think would have happened if he dumped his seat in Congress and ran 3rd party like you wanted him to? Who would be president today if he had run 3rd party? What good would come?
dviesq (January 9, 2009 at 3:47 am)
^picked
dviesq (January 9, 2009 at 3:46 am)
"The stories were the controversy..." I completely disagree. The media was interested in the fall. I saw the stories. There was excitement, curiosity, energy, money. You have this belief that having been a Rep. candidate gave him more exposure. So, he's one of 10 candidates during the debate watched mostly by Reps who already had their candidate piced out. Being one of THREE candidates in a GENERAL debate would not have given him MORE exposure? Pardon me.